OCA preloader logo
Drawing in space - The Open College of the Arts

To find out more details about the transfer to The Open University see A New Chapter for OCA.

Drawing in space thumb

Drawing in space

This is a post from the weareoca.com archive. Information contained within it may now be out of date.
 
Doug Burton reports on two new works at the Serpentine in Kensington Gardens and finds an interesting conceptual linking between this years startling new pavilion and last year’s sculpted memory.
Fischli Weiss 2
An interesting visit to London last week saw me stumble across 2 creative acts that demonstrated a sense of the playful within the context of a public art project. The Serpentine Pavilion has produced many interesting architectural projects with a sculptural edge, that with a brief and budget push the artists and architects conceptual boundaries. Last year I was submerged within Herzog and de Meuron /Ai Weiwei’s collaborative subterranean pavilion. There conceptual approach to the project looked at the area of ground that the pavilion stands on and they set about digging away the earth beneath. Acting as archaeologists, and using the revealed structural components of previous pavilions footings they revealed the pre-history to the site and used these contours and obstructions to form the design of the pavilion. The layering of strata that was occurring within the sculpted underground cavernous experience created an incredible sculpted quality to the architectural components, the whole space was clad in cork and made the feeling of descending within the space almost bouncy, safe and ultimately quite cosy. The day I went it was teaming with rain and the roof structure acted as both lid and horizon, framing the outside world into a thin strip of light, which reminded me of the visual effect within a second world war bunker – looking out through the gun slit within the buttress of concrete.
Ai Weiwei Pavillion 2012 2
Today’s pavilion has been created by the young Japanese architect Sou Fujimoto. My visit this time was with glorious sunshine, the pavilion rose up in white as if light and ephemeral appearing like an apparition within the landscape of Kensington gardens. There was a fabulous direct contrast between this pavilion and last years, going from the bowls of the earth – to the elevation of a latticed structure, the time lapse of 12months created an intense feeling of memory and history within my sensation of this site. Fujimoto’s design uses 20mm steel box section poles welded together at equal intervals to form three-dimensional boxes that sculpturally evolve throughout the space. The pavilion is like a cloud, it’s a cliché to say so, but the way that it changes as you move around it and through it feels like a form that is folding in and out of your view.
Fujimoto 1
Fujimoto 4
Fujimoto 3
I was interested in the way that Herzog and de Meuron /Ai Weiwei’s pavilion used a sculptural sense of moving from an initial idea to having to work with the space as it was, being pushed and pulled by the obstructions and strata that would engage with the team as they formed the space. Like Michaelangelo releasing the form from its confines within the marble, the 2012 pavilion adopted a traditional sense of space and form, revealing itself as architectural structure as the material was removed. Fujimoto approached his pavilion with an initial idea but a detailed sketchbook full of red ink drawings, rapidly sketching the form out, show an idea developing through the evolution of a thought process to the final working drawing. If you visit the serpentine go into the bookshop and there is a copy of his sketchbook that is a really interesting insight into Fujimoto’s working method.
The use of an idea pushed to its limit within an artistic sculptural context has been produced just round the corner from the pavilion by the Swiss artist duo Fischli and Weiss. There sculpture “Rock on Top of Another Rock” (2012/13) sits in almost satirical contrast to the elevation of the pavilion. The work might seem absurd at first glance but its hiding a clever investigation into the nature of creating a work or art. How did this get hear? how much effort did it take? am I supposed to take this monumental work for granted, as if nature intended this thing to sit here in this way, or is it almost slapping me across the face with its delicate balance and interesting oblique angles. The work for me sits very well against the Fujimoto pavilion with is hyper-realism and perfect geometry the Fischli and Weiss boulders almost make me want to grow into a giant and play with both forms, or even better watch my 2yr old son as he plays with rocks and stickle bricks with all his uncluttered intuition for making things and allowing the world to both sit and evolve.
Top image Fischli Weiss
Second image Ai Weiwei Pavillion 2012
Lower images Fujimoto
All images copyright Doug Burton 2013


Posted by author: Doug Burton

8 thoughts on “Drawing in space

  • It has made me think about the relationship between building and sculpture and space of which I know little.
    I like the comparison between Michelangelo’s carving and the processes involved in making the 2012 pavilion.
    The airiness of the 2013 made me think of ‘the cloud’ and also that the support could be the structure because in ways it looks and maybe feels like a scaffold or armature.
    And then WHAT is supporting that rock on top of another rock???

  • Enjoyed all the descriptions of the different textures – first of all the warm cosy bouncy cork, then the smooth steel – I could imagine the sun glinting on the surface just like it would on cloud contrasting light with grey. Next the rough indented boulders – I began to consider the difference (if any) between a rock and a boulder & how our view of static forms are changed through words. How use of words in art can alter our vision. Perhaps word games can become part of the playfulness involved here. If I were a giant I’d be a ventriloquist and tip that rock with my finger to make it speak.

  • It seems, to me, that a lot of contemporary sculpture is about gimmicks and puns and not about form and space. It is good to see architects using form and space in a traditionally sculptural way to create a sense of wonder and containment.

  • The 2012 pavilion is/was a clever play on park furniture, ponds and grottos and well-placed in it’s environment. It’s earthy and has substance. The 2013 version is a good contrast, it’s all hard surfaces, playing with light and looking up. Because it’s looking up and out, maybe to be impressive it needs to scale up and be infinitely bigger. Maybe it’s the sort of structure that only really works in digital space where there’s less constraint? It will look better in the autumn when the leaves catch in the structure and ground it a little. This is subjective, as is this… pavilions in parks are usually public spaces and they work better when they cease to be self-conscious, and merge into their environment, and evolve as people use them (or not). That takes time, and I don’t think it helps if you knock them down and replace them every year. But then, maybe this is not that sort of park either…

  • Thank you for your interesting comments and opinions. I agree with you Pam seeing the work in digital space with all that infinity perspective would create less constraint over our sense of scale with it. The autumn leaves on the floor of the structure will definately be worth a look at with camera in hand.
    Dorothy, you have touched on a key critical point with me, using words to capture a sense of materiality, this can also be played with in titles of artworks.

  • Again, another place for me to see during my next visit to London. 🙂 Thanks Doug for sharing your thoughts with us!
    I really love the contrast in art and the feeling one gets when experiencing the two pavilions. Even if it is only through the description of someone else!
    Getting into art gets a whole new meaning if one can actually walk into an art piece, or if it is so big, that it is really difficult to view it in a whole….
    And like Deirdre I would rally like to know how that rock can sit on top of the other..:)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to blog listings